Last Sunday, my good F/friend Gail and I had lunch. Among the many things we talked about was my new habit of saying things like "back to reading Book [number]" and paying so much attention to how many books I've read. I blamed a former colleague, who convinced me to review what I was reading (she was appalled that I just read and moved on) - the Killin' Time Reading blog is the result. Ok, it was also a good way to see how high Mt. Bookpile had grown.
Then a couple of years ago I started to participate in the GoodReads reading challenge and managed to read 250 books (prior to then, I'd averaged 100-150 books a year since leaving college). Then last year, 400. This despite "wasting" time doing other things like watching tv, sleeping, working on consulting assignments, etc. - but not working full time. 400. And now, when I go to GR to mark another book read or add some to Mt. Bookpile, I see the total I've read for this year's challenge (hoping for 300).
Still, after it was mentioned, I had to wonder: was I saying this for thee or me? There's a wonderful flow chart that helps guide Quakers as to when they should speak in Meeting... or not. Over the past week I've pondered how I've been approaching the Books Read issue, as well as this blog, twitter, several of my e-mails... am I truly writing for thee, or for me? Who really cares about the pensées of Lazygal, or her rants? Do my book reviews matter?
Until I have clarity on this, don't expect too much from this blog.